June was another busy month for Team Rhino! From connecting with clients and industry partners at conferences and golf tournaments to hosting educational training events and joining clients for summer celebrations, our team had the opportunity to build relationships, share knowledge, and stay engaged with the communities we serve.
A workers' compensation compromise and release (C&R) agreement is not enforceable until approved by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board[1] (LC 5001). Under CCR 10700, the WCAB is affirmatively required to inquire into the adequacy of all C&R agreements and may set a hearing to take evidence when necessary to determine whether a settlement should be approved or disapproved.
The doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel can bar parties from re-litigating claims and issues that were decided previously in workers' compensation proceedings. Res judicata, or claim preclusion, acts to bar claims that were, or should have been, advanced in a previous suit involving the same parties. It arises if a second suit: (1) involves the same cause of action; (2) is between the same parties; and (3) occurs after a final judgment on the merits. (DKN Holdings LLC v. Faerber (2015) 61 Cal. 4th 813, 824.)
May was a busy month for MS&A, filled with opportunities to connect, learn, and engage with the communities we serve. From industry conferences and educational presentations to client gatherings and team-building events, our attorneys and staff were on the move throughout the month.
As Michael Sullivan & Associates celebrates 30 years of serving California employers, we’re taking time throughout the year to reflect on the people, relationships, and milestones that have shaped our journey since the firm opened for business in 1996. To mark this occasion, MS&A Founder and General Managing Partner Michael Sullivan shares a personal letter reflecting on the firm’s growth—from its humble beginnings to the statewide industry leader it is today.
The utilization review (UR) process begins when a claims administrator receives a completed request for authorization from a treating physician. Under the updated UR regulations that became effective April 1, 2026, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, § 9792.6.1(u) defines what constitutes a valid "request for authorization," and specifies the conditions under which a request is deemed "completed" for purposes of triggering the UR clock. CCR 9792.9.1(b) addresses the claims administrator's obligations on receipt of a request that does not meet the definition of a completed request.
Once a qualified medical evaluator (QME) has been selected in a represented case, California Code of Regulation (CCR) 34(b) explains that any subsequent evaluation may be performed at a different medical office of the selected QME if that office is listed with the medical director and is "within a reasonable geographic distance from the injured worker's residence." Labor Code § 4062.3(k) further directs that, after a medical evaluation is prepared, the parties "shall utilize the same medical evaluator who prepared the previous evaluation to resolve the medical dispute" to the extent possible. Together, those provisions reflect a strong preference for continuity of the medical-legal evaluator, and they set the framework for disputes that arise when a QME relocates his or her practice.
April kept the MS&A team on the move—from engaging with HR leaders at industry events to hosting a Lunch & Learn with clients, connecting across our offices, and even taking in a ballgame together in San Diego. It was a month full of meaningful conversations, team-building moments, and opportunities to strengthen the relationships that drive what we do.
