April kept the MS&A team on the move—from engaging with HR leaders at industry events to hosting a Lunch & Learn with clients, connecting across our offices, and even taking in a ballgame together in San Diego. It was a month full of meaningful conversations, team-building moments, and opportunities to strengthen the relationships that drive what we do.
In accepted cases, Labor Codes 4061 and 4062 establish the procedures by which parties may dispute a medical determination made by a primary treating physician (PTP) and, when the employee is represented by an attorney, obtain a comprehensive medical evaluation through the qualified medical evaluator (QME) panel process under LC 4062.2. Under LC 4061(b), a valid objection may be raised to a PTP's medical determination "concerning the existence or extent of permanent impairment and limitations or the need for future medical care." Under LC 4062(a), objections to medical determinations may be raised to issues not covered by LC 4061 (for example, ongoing temporary disability, body parts injured, work restriction).
March kept the MS&A team on the move! From connecting with clients at a hosted happy hour to sharing insights at conferences like Central California SHRM and EWC&R, it was a month full of learning, collaboration, and great conversations.
We also enjoyed time with our community at events like crab feeds and local SHRM gatherings, continued our North State Training series, and hosted a happy hour for our El Segundo office.
California lawmakers are taking a closer look at how artificial intelligence is shaping the workplace—and what it means for employers.
A new slate of proposed legislation—supported by organized labor and policymakers involved in recent worker protection efforts—aims to introduce guardrails around the use of AI on the job. Two key bills—SB 951 and SB 947—take different but complementary approaches.
Labor Code § 4610(l) allows an employer to defer conducting utilization review (UR) of a request for medical treatment "while the employer is disputing liability for injury or treatment of the condition for which treatment is recommended pursuant to Section 4062." Former California Code of Regulation (CCR) 9792.9.1(b) and new CCR 9792.9.2(a), effective April 1, 2026, state that a request for authorization "may be deferred if the claims administrator disputes liability for either the occupational injury for which the treatment is recommended or the recommended treatment itself on grounds other than medical necessity." That procedure protects defendants from having to immediately determine the medical necessity of treatment for a potentially nonindustrial condition.
Effective April 1, 2026, the Division of Workers’ Compensation (DWC) adopts a comprehensive and extensive set of new regulations governing utilization review (UR), independent medical review (IMR) and physician reporting. The regulations are available on the DWC's rulemaking page.
The changes are primarily driven by the legislative mandates of Assembly Bill (AB) 1124 and Senate Bill (SB) 1160, which were enacted to address complaints of excessive UR delays and denials. The overarching goals of the new regulations are to align the review process with SB 1160 and AB 1124, and to improve the process of the delivering medical treatment within workers’ compensation.
From celebrating excellence in the legal community at the Langston Bar Association awards to connecting with public sector leaders at the Public Agency Risk Management Association conference, February was filled with meaningful conversations and community engagement, along with opportunities to strengthen relationships across the industries we serve.
Check out the photos below to see how our teams came together to learn, grow, and unwind!
If you'd like to join MS&A at one of our upcoming events, just follow us on one of our social media channels--we're on LinkedIn, Instagram, and Facebook. We'd love to have you attend one of our events!
Labor Code § 4062.2 establishes the rules for requesting a panel of qualified medical evaluators (QMEs) when an employee is represented by an attorney. After a panel is obtained, LC 4062.2(c) states, "Within 10 days of assignment of the panel by the administrative director, each party may strike one name from the panel." The statute does not describe the appropriate method for exercising a strike, but it adds, "The administrative director may prescribe the form, the manner, or both, by which the parties shall conduct the selection process." Although the administrative director has adopted regulations related to the QME selection process in the California Code of Regulations (CCR) 29 et seq, none of the regulations discusses the striking process.
